Comparative Cloud Analysis: Performance and Value of Denv-R Versus AWS
The cloud computing market has experienced exponential growth in recent years, making the selection of a cloud service provider (CSP) increasingly complex. In this constantly evolving landscape, businesses and developers need clear benchmarks to evaluate performance, costs, and other essential criteria. This article aims to provide an objective insight into these aspects, with a focus on Denv-R, a French cloud provider, using Amazon Web Services (AWS) as a point of comparison.
Methodology
To ensure objectivity and reliability in our analysis, we employed a series of industry-standard benchmarks. These tests cover a variety of metrics, including CPU performance, RAM, and bandwidth, as well as value for money.
Why Denv-R and AWS?
Denv-R is an emerging player in the field of cloud computing in France, offering a range of services that includes ethical and sovereign cloud solutions. Amazon Web Services (AWS), as one of the global market leaders in cloud services, serves as a benchmark to contextualize the performance and features of Denv-R.
Purpose of the Article
The aim of this article is not to promote one provider over another but to provide an unbiased analysis that will help decision-makers choose the provider best suited to their specific needs.
Sysbench CPU: CPU Performance Analysis between Denv-R and AWS
The CPU, or central processing unit, is often considered the "brain" of a computer or virtual machine. It plays a crucial role in determining the speed at which instructions are executed, and thus the overall performance of the machine. In this section, we use Sysbench, a benchmarking tool, to compare the CPU performance of Denv-R and AWS.
Observations
In our data sample, both providers, Denv-R and AWS, offer instances with 8 CPU cores. Here are some highlights from our analysis:
- Average event speed (Event Speed (mean)): Denv-R shows an average event speed of 2285, which is significantly higher than AWS's 956.
- Performance variability (Standard Deviation): The standard deviation of the event speed for Denv-R is also higher (185.4) compared to AWS (3.5). This could indicate greater variability in Denv-R's performance.
Advice
- CPU Performance: If CPU performance is an important criterion for you, Denv-R seems to be an interesting option due to its significantly higher average event speed.
- Performance Consistency: However, it is essential to consider performance variability, as indicated by the standard deviation. Greater variability may have implications for applications requiring consistent performance.
Sysbench RAM: RAM Transfer Speed Evaluation between Denv-R and AWS
RAM (Random Access Memory) is another key component of a cloud instance, serving as temporary storage for data being processed by the CPU. Efficient RAM can significantly impact the speed and efficiency of an application. In this section, we also use Sysbench to evaluate the RAM transfer speed in reading and writing for Denv-R and AWS.
Observations
As in the CPU section, we observe that both providers offer instances with 8 CPU cores. Here are some key observations:
- Read transfer speed (Transfer Speed (Read)): AWS has a significantly higher read transfer speed than Denv-R: 29362 MB/sec versus 13548 MB/sec.
- Write transfer speed (Transfer Speed (Write)): The write transfer speed is also higher at AWS, with 9297 MB/sec versus 5292 MB/sec for Denv-R.
- Performance variability (Standard Deviation): Denv-R shows a higher standard deviation for read transfer speed, which could indicate greater variability in performance.
Advice
- RAM Performance: If RAM performance is a priority for your application or business, AWS appears to offer faster transfer speeds in both reading and writing.
- Performance Variability: As with the CPU, performance variability is a factor to consider. The higher standard deviation for Denv-R may be an element to consider if you need more consistent performance.
Geekbench 5: Multi-Core and Single-Core Performance Comparison between Denv-R and AWS
Geekbench is another popular benchmarking tool that assesses CPU performance by focusing on two key aspects: multi-core and single-core performance. These two aspects are essential for understanding how a cloud instance can handle parallel and sequential tasks. In this section, we look at the multi-core and single-core performance of Denv-R and AWS according to Geekbench 5.
Observations
As in the previous sections, Denv-R and AWS offer instances with 8 CPU cores. Here are some notable observations:
- Average multi-core score: Denv-R has a higher average multi-core score, 6073 than AWS, 5188.
- Average single-core score: Conversely, AWS has a higher average single-core score, 1172, compared to Denv-R, 961.
- Performance variability (Standard Deviation): The standard deviation of the multi-core score for Denv-R is higher, indicating greater variability in performance.
Advice
- Multi-Core Performance: If multi-core performance is a priority for your needs, Denv-R could be a good choice thanks to its higher average score.
- Single-Core Performance: For applications requiring better single-core performance, AWS seems to be the preferable choice.
- Performance Variability: As with the previous sections, it is important to consider performance variability. The higher standard deviation for Denv-R could be a factor to consider.
Geekbench 5 (Price/Perf): Value for Money Evaluation between Denv-R and AWS
Cost is often just as important a factor as performance when it comes to choosing a cloud service provider. In this section, we use a specific metric from Geekbench 5 to evaluate the value for money, or "performance per unit of cost," between Denv-R and AWS.
Observations
- Performance per unit of cost (Price-Perf (mean)): Denv-R presents a significantly higher performance per unit of cost than AWS: 60M versus 12M.
Advice
- Cost Optimization: If you are looking to maximize performance per unit of cost, Denv-R appears to offer much better value than AWS according to these data.
Geekbench 6: A New Dimension in Multi-Core and Single-Core Performance Comparison between Denv-R and AWS
Geekbench 6 is an updated version of the Geekbench benchmarking tool, offering more rigorous tests and more accurate metrics to assess the performance of cloud instances. In this section, we will examine the multi-core and single-core performance of Denv-R and AWS according to Geekbench 6 data.
Observations
- Average multi-core score: According to Geekbench 6, Denv-R presents a higher average multi-core score (6641) compared to AWS (5956).
- Average single-core score: However, AWS holds a higher average single-core score (1592) compared to Denv-R (1310).
- Performance variability (Standard Deviation): The standard deviation of the multi-core score for Denv-R is lower in this version of the benchmark compared to Geekbench 5, suggesting less variability.
Advice
- Multi-Core Performance: If multi-core performance is important for your needs, Denv-R continues to be a potentially good choice with a higher average score in Geekbench 6.
- Single-Core Performance: AWS remains the preferable choice for solid single-core performance, according to Geekbench 6 data.
- Performance Consistency: The lower standard deviation for Denv-R in Geekbench 6 suggests that the performance is more consistent in this version of the benchmark.
Bandwidth: Comparative Evaluation of Data Transfer Capacity between Denv-R and AWS
Bandwidth is a crucial factor for many applications and services, affecting everything from video streaming to database management. Higher bandwidth allows for faster data transfer, which can be essential for real-time applications or services that require large amounts of data. In this section, we will examine the bandwidth performance of Denv-R and AWS.
Observations
- Maximum bandwidth (Bandwidth Max): Denv-R has a much higher maximum bandwidth than AWS: 30,287.9 Mbps versus 11,812.8 Mbps.
- Average bandwidth (Bandwidth Mean): Denv-R's average bandwidth is also superior: 23,785.6 Mbps versus 11,775.8 Mbps for AWS.
- Performance variability (Standard Deviation): The standard deviation of the bandwidth for Denv-R is significantly higher, indicating greater variability in performance.
Advice
- Data Transfer Capacity: If bandwidth is an important criterion for you, Denv-R appears to offer significantly better performance in terms of maximum and average capacity.
- Performance Variability: Once again, variability is a factor to consider. The large standard deviation at Denv-R could be a consideration factor if you need consistent bandwidth.
Conclusion: Strengths and Weaknesses of the French Cloud Denv-R
After examining Denv-R's performance in detail and comparing it to that of AWS, a global industry leader, several key conclusions emerge.
Strengths of Denv-R
- CPU Performance: Denv-R excels in the area of CPU performance, with Sysbench scores superior to those of AWS. If CPU speed is a priority, Denv-R is a serious option to consider.
- Multi-Core Performance: According to Geekbench 5 and 6 data, Denv-R has also demonstrated superior multi-core performance, which can be important for applications requiring parallel processing.
- Value for Money: One of Denv-R's greatest strengths is its excellent value for money, as evidenced by the metrics from Geekbench 5 and 6.
- Bandwidth: In terms of maximum and average bandwidth, Denv-R significantly outperforms AWS.
Weaknesses of Denv-R
- Single-Core and RAM Performance: AWS tends to outperform Denv-R in terms of single-core performance and RAM transfer speed in reading and writing.
- Performance Variability: An area where Denv-R could improve is the variability of performance. In several tests, the standard deviation of Denv-R's performance measurements was higher, indicating greater variability.